-
RSS Subscribe
-
Books
Luis Palau
The Global Warming Consensus Nuts Just Lost
This article is to point the folly of Al Gore and the rest of you dolts that have bought the mantra of Global Warming – Hook, Line and Sinker. The big crime is the assertion that this is “settled science.” It is not only now called into question by the group from which the assertion first came, but also is starting to lean in the direction that and degree of settlement on the science is in the direction the point that Global Warming if it indeed exists is not man made HERE. Are 50,000 Physicists enough to shut up the lie that the scientific community is in consensus on Global Warming?
For goodness sake, what is settled is the fact that man’s unique contribution to the carbon in the atmosphere is limited to 2-3 percent. Now for those of you that hold the arrogant view of the mainstream on Global Warming and think the rest of us are right wing nuts should read the link below and crawl back into your hole of ignorant bliss.
Bill O’Reilly is a Pinhead
Bill O’Reilly had John Stossel (a well know Libertarian and award winning news correspondent and co-anchor of ABC’s 20/20 news magazine) on his program discussing the Nobel Peace Prize awarded to Al Gore. ABC’S John Stossel made a wonderful presentation (like he always does) about the bogus nature of Gore’s work in the movie “Inconvenient Truth” including the point that the increased polar temperature levels came before the carbon dioxide levels went up.
Why is Bill O’Reilly being labeled with the much vilified (on The O’Reilly Factor) term “Pinhead” here at NSL? …..because he took an opposing view from Stossel and based it on a position that CLEARLY demonstrates he doesn’t even categorically understand the nature of the debate. O’Reilly gave kudos to Al Gore by saying that “even if Al Gore’s facts are wrong, his message is worthy.” Something regularly stated in the comments section of NSL itself. Bill goes on further to claim that he (Al Gore) did a good job in “raising awareness that we need to clean the planet. I’d like conservatives and liberals to get together and talk about how to clean things up.” Sheeeesh…..
Bill O’Reilly must believe that CO2 is a common garden variety environmental pollutant. Apart from Gore’s bogus thesis that (man made) CO2 emissions are raising the temperature of the planet CO2 is not a pollutant and is part of the natural and ordinary processes on the planet. So accordingly, Al Gore’s thesis on CO2 emissions rises or falls on the Global Warming issue and is not further augmented by the “environmental pollution” argument. All O”Reilly points out here is his own ignorance on the framework of the debate (apart from his or anyone else’s position). I wrote Bill O’Reilly today and explained his error and requested a retraction on air………..we’ll see, if he doesn’t he is a Pinhead. Below is the full segment summary from Bill O’Reilly’s website.
Al Gore may have a Nobel Peace Prize, but he doesn’t have the approval of ABC’s John Stossel. “Gore is saying the debate is over,” Stossel complained, “and that anyone who disagrees has been purchased. That is repulsive intimidation. Yes, the globe has warmed, but to say for sure that man caused it and government can fix it, that debate is by no means over. How about the exaggerations in Gore’s movie? He says polar bears are drowning when polar bear populations are increasing. He didn’t reveal that temperature increase came before carbon dioxide levels went up.” The Factor argued that even if Al Gore’s facts are wrong, his message is worthy. “He did a good job in raising awareness that we need to clean the planet. I’d like to conservatives and liberals to get together and talk about how to clean things up.
Now That is What I’m Talking About !!!
Again, I have been away tending to pressing family matters, but I wanted to comment on this recent article about a new vehicle. BMW is taking to (very limited) production it new H7 Hybird Gasoline/Hydrogen engine powered sedan.
I have laughed and scoffed at the E-85 solutions, the Prius Hybird and the role that Carbon Offsets are alleged to play in it all, but this in my opinion has the potential to be the real deal. I will sign on when they move this to a straight Hydrogen fuel powered vehicle and ditch the gasoline altogether. This vehicle has recently been tested in Palm Beach and I am including a link HERE for the complete article from the Palm Beach Post. I encourage you to read it. I think the government and al gore could better spend their time supporting this type of effort as opposed to the nonsense they are spieling.
This could take some time to get the tank down to a more manageable size, engineer affordability into it and provide for a better infrastructure for Hydrogen (gas stations), but even if it is 5 or 10 or even 15 years, this is a better solution and we should drill all the oil we can to keep the economy alive until we reach the “golden age” of motor fuel.
By-The-Way, it is pretty good looking isn’t it? I think it already looks much better than the current (disappointing) iteration of the BMW 3, 5 and 7 series. This would really be a sweet deal concerning our “friends” in the Middle East.